The government has complete authority over the economy and all main aspects of production under a command economy, often known as a centrally planned economy. Instead of being determined by supply and demand in a free market economy, the government controls what is manufactured and how it is sold.
A Communist government is characterized by a command economy, which Karl Marx defined as “common ownership of the means of production” in the Communist Manifesto.
Overproduction and stifling innovation are two of the risks of command economies that have led several long-time command countries, such as Russia and China, to adopt free market methods to compete effectively in the international market.
List of Contents
What Is a Command Economy?
The term “command economy” refers to a system in which the government has a total say over all aspects of the economy. Commands, rules, and national goals are just some of the administrative efforts necessary to keep complex social and economic systems running smoothly.
To rephrase, a command economy is an authoritarian economic organization in which a political or social hierarchy has complete control over all monetary policy decisions. All the way down to the individual workers, everyone in the economy conforms to the decisions these authorities make.
Development of the Theory
After World War One, Austrian economist Otto Neurath conceived the idea of a command economy. It was proposed by Neurath to curb hyperinflation. The German word “Befehlswirtschaft” originates from the English phrase “command economy.” It was an analysis of the Nazi economy under fascism.
Though the term originated in Nazi Germany, centrally planned economies have been around much longer. A command economy can be defined as a system in which the government regulates economic activity rather than allowing market forces to set prices and allocate resources. The United States, which has long been seen as a bastion of free-market economics, has nonetheless adopted some aspects of command economies, such as allocating resources to the war effort during times of crisis.
How Command Economies Work
In today’s command economies, the government is in charge of formulating the overall economic strategy. For instance, a five-year plan may be established in which the government specifies economic and social objectives for each industry and geographical area. Goals are transformed into more manageable, near-term targets through shorter-term strategies.
The government doles out all resources according to some grand scheme. It seeks to optimize the country’s financial and human resources and material goods.
The central plan prioritizes all products and services. This entails not just free markets but also pricing and production caps. The objective is to ensure that all citizens have access to adequate food, shelter, and other necessities. Priorities, such as war mobilization, are also established at the national level and are guided by the central plan.
The government holds monopolies in the banking, energy, and car industries because of their centrality to the economy’s success. In other words, a lack of domestic rivalry in government-controlled industries is a defining element of a command economy.
Laws, regulations, and government orders are drafted to implement the master plan. The organization meets its production and staffing goals as outlined in the program. They are helpless in the face of competitive markets.
Examples of Command Economies
Here are some real-world examples of command economies:
- The economy of Belarus, a former Soviet satellite, is still managed centrally. As of 2022, the government owns 75% of the country’s banks and 80% of its enterprises.
- In China, Mao Tse-Tung established a communist regime after World War II. His economic policies were vigorously enforced. The current administration is making strides toward a free market. They have continued the practice of drafting five-year plans that detail financial targets.
- Revolution spearheaded by Fidel Castro in 1959 brought Communism and a planned economy to Cuba. The Soviet Union supported Cuba’s economy until the 1990s. To stimulate economic development, the government is gradually implementing market reforms.
- Regarding Iran’s economy, the government has direct and indirect control over large swaths of the market. Sanctions imposed by the international community have exacerbated the difficulties already caused by this type of control by causing economic stagnation and inefficiency. These sanctions were lifted in 2015 as part of a nuclear trade deal, only to be reinstated by the United States in 2018 after President Trump withdrew from the agreement.
- Government employment accounts for most Libyans, and the country’s economy is nearly exclusively dependent on the oil and gas sector.
- One of the world’s most centrally planned economies has been in North Korea for decades. Due to poor leadership, underinvestment, and a lack of resources, the United States government estimates that North Korea’s industrial capital stock is nearly beyond repair. North Koreans continue to struggle with food shortages and malnutrition.
- As part of the Russian Revolution led by Vladimir Lenin in 1917, the world’s first Communist command economy was established in Russia. The USSR’s command economy lasted from the 1930s until the late 1980s and was the longest-running in history. Since the Soviet Union’s collapse, the Russian government has allowed oligarchs to take control of the country’s most influential businesses.
Advantages and Disadvantages of a Command Economy
Pros
✔ Speed
✔ Unity
Cons
✘ Fails to take into account customers’ preferences
✘ Inefficiencies
✘ Discouragement of innovation
Advantages Explained
1. Speed
With a planned economy, the government may swiftly and effectively mobilize various economic resources, which is a significant benefit. They can carry out large undertakings, generate industrial power, and accomplish social aims. Things like individual lawsuits or EISs don’t slow them down.
2. Unity
Quickly mobilizing widespread economic resources is a significant strength of planned economies. They can carry out large-scale initiatives, generate industrial power, and achieve social aims. Individuals’ complaints or EISs don’t seem to slow them down.
Disadvantages Explained
1. Fails to take into account customers’ preferences
As a result of this fast mobilization, command economies frequently trample other societal needs, ignoring consumer preferences in the process. Workers are discouraged from relocating, for instance, because the government dictates the duties they must perform. Products are not always made in response to market needs. When citizens in a command economy can’t get their hands on the goods and services they require, they often turn to the underground market, sometimes known as the “black market,” to meet their basic requirements and wants. If leaders try to impose their will on this market, they will lose support from their constituents.
2. Inefficiencies
An inefficiency of command economies is that they tend to create an excess of one good while falling short on others. Central planners have difficulty getting timely data about consumer wants and needs. It is significantly more difficult for command economies to generate the proper exports at the internationally competitive market pricing to meet the needs of foreign markets.
3. Discouragement of innovation
Negative attitudes toward innovation Business executives in command economies tend to be rewarded for taking orders. Due to the nature of the system, innovation and risk-taking are stifled.
Conclusion
In a command economy, the government or other authoritative body decides on the output level, the kind of services to be offered, and the prices to be charged. Socialism is one of the most well-known examples of a command economy. Capitalism, or a free market economy, is widely seen as its polar opposite. A command economy cannot produce the same level of prosperity as a free market economy. Therefore, some governments combine features of command economics with free market economics.
FAQs
A command economy is one in which the government makes all decisions about the production, consumption, and distribution of commodities and services. The government controls all areas of the economy under a command economy, including pricing, salaries, and resource distribution. The government determines what is produced, how much is produced, and at what price the products are sold.
A command economy has the advantages of ensuring that everyone has access to basic essentials such as food, housing, and healthcare. This is because the government may distribute resources based on people’s needs rather than market demands. Furthermore, because the government can manage inflation and avert economic crises, a command economy can be more stable than a market economy.
North Korea, Cuba, and China are examples of countries having command economies. These countries’ economies are subject to varied degrees of government control, with China moving toward a more market-based economy in recent years.
The question of whether a command economy can function in the current world is still being debated. Some think that governments must have a large role in the economy to guarantee that everyone has access to basic requirements and that the economy is stable. Others say that a command economy is unsuited for modern society due to its inefficiencies and lack of creativity.
Related Articles:
Read more: Economies
Source: The Balance